🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."